Federal Court of Australia
Value increased after award
- What it measures
- The contract’s value rose after it was first published.
- When it applies
- An increase of at least 50% and at least $1 million from the first published value.
- Why it matters
- Agencies must publish amendments that change a contract’s value. Large increases can mean the original scope or price was understated.
- Common explanations
- Additional work or an extended term agreed after award. Options in the original contract that were later taken up. A correction to a value entered wrongly.
Showing Federal Court of Australia only. Show all agencies.
Contracts
Contracts published in 2025-26 and 2026-27 to date, largest amount first. Contracts with suppliers who are individuals are counted in the totals but not listed (why).
| Contract | Agency | Published | Detail | Amount involved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft VSA5 CN4183441 |
Federal Court of Australia | 2025-08-27 | +127% on first published value | $4.2m |
| Network Storage CN4194056 |
Federal Court of Australia | 2025-10-13 | +20732% on first published value | $3.0m |
| Transcription Services - Contingency for Current service Provider CN4252632 |
Federal Court of Australia | 2026-06-25 | +220% on first published value | $2.2m |
| Transcription Services - Contingency for Current service Provider CN4252633 |
Federal Court of Australia | 2026-06-25 | +220% on first published value | $2.2m |
| Transcription Services - Contingency for Current service Provider CN4252636 |
Federal Court of Australia | 2026-06-25 | +220% on first published value | $2.2m |
| Transcription Services - Contingency for Current service Provider CN4252637 |
Federal Court of Australia | 2026-06-25 | +220% on first published value | $2.2m |
| Transcription Services - Contingency for Current service Provider CN4252638 |
Federal Court of Australia | 2026-06-25 | +220% on first published value | $2.2m |